State v. Davis
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 64
Syllabus
Consecutive sentences clearly and convincingly rape sexual battery first-time offender R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Defendant-appellant challenges the imposition of consecutive sentences on the grounds that the record does not clearly and convincingly support the findings made by the trial court. Defendant argues that because he was a first-time offender and that there is nothing to indicate he would reoffend. The record clearly and convincingly supported the imposition of consecutive sentences because of the seriousness of the defendant's conduct, the trauma of the victim, and the risk the defendant posed in the future.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. VenesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 321×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-14· cited 37×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 33×
- State v. MetzOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-03· cited 26×
- State v. TidmoreOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-25· cited 17×
- State v. PetersOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-31· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.