Skip to main content
· 1/21/2000

Forster v. Pierce County

Citations

  • 991 P.2d 687
  • 99 Wash. App. 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Davis court’s discussion of Minnesota law was dictum and disagreeing with case to extent that it found Minnesota law applied to past conduct
  • disagreeing with Davis to extent that it found Minnesota law applied to past conduct
  • disagreeing with Davis to extent that it found Minnesota law applied to past conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.