People v. Russom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he factual details of the pending cases against [the] witness were not relevant to the witness’s biases, prejudices, or motives for testifying against [the] defendant”
• concluding there was no prejudice to the defendant when there were no allegations that a juror, subject to voir dire and challenges before trial, was biased or that the replacement of a juror resulted in an unfair trial
• a recording is nontestimonial if it depicts ‘.‘the event itself rather than a narration thereof’
• “Jurors may have access during deliberations to nontestimonial recordings that depict the event itself rather than a narration thereof.”
• “Jurors may have access during deliberations to nontestimonial recordings that depict the event itself rather than a narration thereof.”
• audio recording of drug sale was nontestimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).