State v. Pender

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a police officer’s questions about the presence and location of weapons during the execution of an arrest warrant “ ‘served a noncriminal, noninvesti-gatory purpose’ and was not ‘designed to elicit an incriminatory response’ ” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kooyman
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2005-05-19· cited 15×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-20· cited 10×
• United States v. Travis Lester
  Sixth Circuit· 2024-04-16· cited 7×
• State v. Grover
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-04-28· cited 6×
• State v. Lanier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-31· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Rhode Island v. Innis
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
• New York v. Quarles
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
• State v. Fish
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 76×
• State v. Tippetts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-27· cited 30×
• State v. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-13· cited 20×