State v. Lanier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, “because the question asked by the officer was designed to elicit incriminating information, Miranda warnings were required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schmidtke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 9×
• State v. Shevyakov
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-05· cited 8×
• State v. Montiel-Delvalle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-17· cited 5×
• State v. Delgado-Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-22· cited 2×
• State v. Cartier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-22· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rhode Island v. Innis
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
• Pennsylvania v. Muniz
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
• State v. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-13· cited 20×
• State v. Pender
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 8×
• State v. Grover
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-04-28· cited 6×