Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/2/2013
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 174 Wash. App. 328
- 298 P.3d 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant failed to satisfy both prongs of the test
- finding public access to bailiff’s decision to dismiss jurors for illness-related reasons pre-voir-dire would not serve a positive role
- finding the experience prong not satisfied where the court engaged in the administrative component of the jury selection process when the bailiff excused two ill jurors before voir dire commenced
- finding no tradition of public access to pre-voir-dire portions of jury selection
- right does not attach to excusal of jurors for illness related reasons because this is pretrial juror excusal, not voir dire
- right does not attach to excusal of jurors for illness-related reasons because this is pretrial juror excusal, not voir dire
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deren, Hunt, Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2014-09-25· cited 127×
- State v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-24· cited 60×
- State v. SlertWashington Supreme Court· 2014-09-25· cited 47×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 2015-08-20· cited 21×
- State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-02· cited 21×
- State Of Washington v. Anthony ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-29· cited 7×
- State Of Washington, Resp. v. Donald H. Turpin, App.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-26· cited 6×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-25· cited 6×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-05-19· cited 4×
- State of Washington v. Unters Lewis LoveCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-24
- State Of Washington, V Anthony R. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-25
- State Of Washington, V Dustin Wade MarksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-02
- State Of Washington, V Leldon Roy PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-01-27
- State Of Washington, V Calvert R. Anderson, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-05-19
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 2016-01-06
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,326×
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,062×
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 981×
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 405×
- In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-10· cited 360×
- In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court· 2013-03-14· cited 316×
- State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 310×
- State v. MomahWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 239×
- State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court· 2005-10-06· cited 233×
- State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 231×
- Allied Daily Newspapers v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court· 1993-04-01· cited 195×
- State v. IrbyWashington Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 170×
- State v. EasterlingWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 167×
- State v. StrodeWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 137×
- State v. PaumierWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 115×
- State v. LormorWashington Supreme Court· 2011-07-21· cited 112×
- United States v. Juan M. Gordon, (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1987-10-01· cited 89×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.