Washington Supreme Court· 9/25/2014

State v. Slert

Citations

181 Wash. 2d 598
334 P.3d 1088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[questioning the jurors about their disqualifying knowledge in open court in front of the other jurors could have been potentially devastating to Slert’s right to a fair trial” due to contamination
\ Slert has not shown there was a closure under the experience and logic test. \
public trial right not implicated by in- chambers discussion of juror questionnaires where no evidence voir dire had been initiated
“Slert has not shown there was a closure under the experience and logic test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: González, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Slert

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.