Skip to main content

State v. Patton

Citations

  • 826 A.2d 783
  • 362 N.J. Super. 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that police are permitted the use of trickery in interrogations but drawing the line at fabricating physical evidence
  • holding the defendant was coerced when the police fabricated an audio tape depicting a fake eye- 16 A-0359-15T3 witness to the crime
  • recognizing the inherently coercive nature of providing a suspect with a falsified eyewitness account of the crime
  • holding \the use of police-fabricated evidence to induce a confession that is then used at trial to support the voluntariness of a confession is per se a violation of due process\
  • noting our courts \have permitted the use of trickery in interrogations.\
  • fabrication of evidence by police to elicit a confession violates due process, and any resulting confession is per se inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Conley, Carchman and Parrillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.