Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/19/1906

Martin v. Texas

Citations

  • 200 U.S. 316
  • 26 S. Ct. 338
  • 50 L. Ed. 497
  • 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1481

Syllabus

<p>While an accused person of African descent on trial in a state court is entitled under the Constitution of the United States to demand that in organizing the grand jury, and empanelling the petit jury,. there shall be no exclusion of his race on account of race and color, such discrimination cannot be established by merely proving that no one of his race was on either of the juries ; and motions to quash, based on alleged discrimi-nations of that nature, must .bo supported by evidence introduced or by an actual offer, of proof in regard thereto. Smith v. Mississippi, 1(52 U. S. 592,. C00, followed^</p> <p>An accused person cannot of right demand a mixed jury some of which . shall be of his race, nor is a jury of that kind guaranteed by the Four- ' teenth Amendment to any race. .</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • We note, in passing, that a Negro served on the jury which convicted the defendant.
  • exclusion of blacks from grand jury service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Martin v. Texas

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.