Supreme Court of Vermont· 5/24/1985
State v. Paquette
Citations
- 497 A.2d 358
- 146 Vt. 1
- 1985 Vt. LEXIS 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that effectiveness of cross-examination was limited by declarants’ inability to recall events in their out-of-court statements, but holding that no Confrontation Clause violation occurred because witnesses could be cross-examined
- noting that facts \sufficiently show that the statement was adopted by the witness\
- noting that facts “sufficiently show that the statement was adopted by the witness”
- no denial of opportunity to cross-examine witness where “the effectiveness of such cross-examination was limited because of the witnesses’ failure to recall the events described in their [prior] statements.”
- no violation of confrontation clause where defendant had opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, although effectiveness of cross-examination was limited because of witnesses' failure to recall events described in their statements
- prior statement that was never admitted into evidence could not be used to convict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson, Larrow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-08-26· cited 50×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 48×
- State v. RobarSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-27· cited 34×
- In re M.B.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-01-17· cited 31×
- State v. MarcySupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-22· cited 27×
- State v. Shawn KelleySupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-05-20· cited 8×
- State v. LanderSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-08-10· cited 8×
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-08-08· cited 6×
- Fontaine v. District Court of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-05-13· cited 5×
- State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-07· cited 4×
- In Re MBSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-01-17
- State v. CervantesNebraska Court of Appeals· 1994-11-01
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- United States v. Claude Leander RileyEighth Circuit· 1981-09-08· cited 131×
- United States v. Gennaro J. OrricoSixth Circuit· 1979-05-09· cited 100×
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-04-01· cited 82×
- United States v. Glen WilliamsSixth Circuit· 1978-03-31· cited 40×
- United States v. Eddie Arden EdwardsNinth Circuit· 1976-08-05· cited 33×
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-10-05· cited 32×
- Mattocks v. Lyman & ColeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1844-01-15· cited 31×
- People v. KubasiakMichigan Court of Appeals· 1980-07-02· cited 29×
- State v. AnderkinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-12-07· cited 22×
- State v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-11-02· cited 19×
- In re M. W. R.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-04-05· cited 10×
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-05-11· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.