State v. Sprague

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial courts have “wide discretion” to determine whether declarant was under the influence of the exciting event
• similar rights under the confrontation clause
• similar rights under the confrontation clause
• pretrial suppression hearing testimony admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brunelle
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 45×
• State v. Ayers
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-09-11· cited 40×
• State v. Paquette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-05-24· cited 20×
• State v. Cameron
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-10-16· cited 9×
• State v. Carroll
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-02-07· cited 8×
• State v. Tedesco
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-07· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• Pointer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
• California v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
• Barber v. Page
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
• Mancusi v. Stubbs
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 704×
• United States v. Frank Wingate and Kenneth Luke Smith
  Second Circuit· 1975-08-04· cited 99×
• United States v. Albert Juan Nunez
  Tenth Circuit· 1982-02-23· cited 62×
• United States v. Franklin
  District of Columbia· 1964-11-13· cited 18×