Washington Supreme Court· 2/1/1990
State v. Fowler
Citations
- 785 P.2d 808
- 114 Wash. 2d 59
- 1990 Wash. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding adverse inference argument without prior judicial determination was improper comment on facts not in the record
- accepting the State's concession that unlawful display meets legal prong of Workman when defendant is charged with second degree assault
- lesser included offense instruction required only when evidence sufficient to support inference that lesser included offense was committed
- constitution requires that jury be instructed on each element of crime
- constitution requires that jury be instructed on each element of crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dolliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 697×
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 563×
- State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 306×
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 303×
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 252×
- State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court· 1992-06-11· cited 215×
- State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court· 1991-09-19· cited 140×
- State v. AumickWashington Supreme Court· 1995-05-18· cited 138×
- State v. DentWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 116×
- State v. Perez-CervantesWashington Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 101×
- State v. EastmondWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 86×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 77×
- State v. Williams-WalkerWashington Supreme Court· 2010-01-14· cited 71×
- City of Bellevue v. LorangWashington Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 71×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-27· cited 67×
- State v. NunezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-02-15· cited 55×
- State v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-04-09· cited 49×
- State v. SpeeceWashington Supreme Court· 1990-10-11· cited 42×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-10· cited 39×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-10-11· cited 37×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1978-09-07· cited 578×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 328×
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 308×
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 224×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-14· cited 170×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1990-03-01· cited 168×
- State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 165×
- State v. AlexisWashington Supreme Court· 1981-02-09· cited 117×
- State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court· 1976-05-27· cited 101×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-09· cited 101×
- State v. PamWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-10· cited 98×
- State v. TongateWashington Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 81×
- State v. McHenryWashington Supreme Court· 1977-09-08· cited 78×
- State v. ClabornWashington Supreme Court· 1981-05-21· cited 77×
- State v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-11· cited 44×
- City of Seattle v. RainwaterWashington Supreme Court· 1976-02-26· cited 32×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-10· cited 32×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of GunterWashington Supreme Court· 1984-10-25· cited 24×
- State v. CoxWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-14· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.