Skip to main content

State v. Outlaw

Citations

  • 748 N.W.2d 349
  • 2008 Minn. App. LEXIS 193
  • 2008 WL 1971456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a prosecutor is free to make legitimate arguments on the basis of all proper inferences from the evidence introduced”
  • reviewing appellant’s claim that evidence was insufficient to show a pattern of criminal conduct under career-offender statute
  • permitting state to “further develop the sentencing record” on remand “so that the district court can appropriately make its determination”
  • reversing and remanding the district court’s sentencing decision and noting that the state would be able “to further develop the sentencing record” on remand to allow the district court to “appropriately make its [sentencing] determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minge, Kalitowski, Connolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.