Skip to main content

State v. Ortiz

Citations

  • 198 Conn. 220
  • 502 A.2d 400
  • 1985 Conn. LEXIS 981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court’s traditional discretion over scope of cross-examination comes into play only after defendant accorded “some irreducible minimum of cross-examination into matters affecting the reliability and credibility of the state’s witnesses”
  • forensic odontologist’s identification of person by bite mark on apple admissible
  • bite mark identification is proper subject of expert testimony
  • denial of cross-examination into witness’ motive and interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dannehy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.