Skip to main content

State v. Ortiz

Citations

  • 766 So. 2d 1137
  • 2000 WL 1188323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that State's admittedly circumstantial evidence of attempted sexual battery showed prima facie case sufficient to withstand motion to dismiss
  • stating that when considering a Rule 3.190(c)(4) motion, \the [S]tate is entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence with all inferences being resolved against the defendant\
  • stating that when considering a Rule 3.190(c)(4) motion, “the [Sjtate is entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence with all inferences being resolved against the defendant”
  • stating that when considering a Rule 3.190(c)(4) motion, “the [Sjtate is entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence with all inferences being resolved against the defendant”
  • stating that when considering a Rule 3.190(c)(4) motion, “the state is entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence with all inferences being resolved against the defendant”
  • stating that when considering a Rule 3.190(c)(4) motion, “the state is entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence with all inferences being resolved against the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jorgenson, Green, and Nesbitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.