Parks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The State is not required to pre-try its case in defense of a motion to dismiss, but need only present sufficient facts that, when viewed in a light most favorable to the State, show that a reasonable jury could find in its favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gennette v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-13· cited 6×
• Peterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-18· cited 2×
• PAUL DEMUS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-10
• Juan C. Casiano v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2021-01-28
• Hazen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-11
• Ramsey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ortiz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-23· cited 35×
• State v. Sholl
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-25· cited 19×
• State v. Terma
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-17· cited 11×
• Lamb v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-08· cited 7×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-13· cited 4×
• State v. Cutwright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-30· cited 3×