Skip to main content
· 10/20/1999

State v. Paleveda

Citations

  • 745 So. 2d 1026
  • 1999 WL 927665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that knowledge in a possession case is question of fact; element of knowledge not proper consideration on motion to dismiss
  • holding that knowledge in possession case is question of fact; element of knowledge not proper consideration on motion to dismiss
  • holding that when considering a defendant's motion to dismiss, the trial court must resolve all questions and inferences from the facts in favor of the State
  • noting that the State need only traverse a sufficient motion
  • \Knowledge of contraband found within an automobile or premises is generally inferred or presumed from one's exclusive possession thereof unless and until proven otherwise.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.