Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, when the evidence permitted competing inferences regarding when the plaintiff should have known that his lawyer had been deficient and that his cause of action had accrued, the issue should go to the trier of fact
• two-year statute of limitations for legal malpractice claims; the discovery rule postpones accrual until a plaintiff knows or should have known of a substantial possibility that he was harmed by a lawyer’s acts or omissions
• elements of a legal malpractice claim are harm, causation, and tortious conduct
• construing discovery rule in legal mal- practice case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).