State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Defendant “is entitled to have his theory of the case presented to the jury, if there is any evidence from which jurors could infer that the required elements of the defense were present and if he has submitted an instruction that correctly states the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Boyce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-19· cited 22×
• State v. Shelley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 11×
• State v. Oneill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-15· cited 10×
• State v. Harper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-21· cited 6×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McBride
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-09-11· cited 24×
• State v. Matthews
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-09-26· cited 21×
• Carter v. Mote
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 19×
• State v. Castle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-02· cited 18×
• State v. Lockwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-12-10· cited 17×
• State v. Hedrick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-02-14· cited 3×
• State v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 2×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-10-12· cited 1×