Atwood v. Vilsack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the State’s interests in rehabilitating sexually violent predators and protecting the public” outweighed the predator’s liberty interest to bail in a civil commitment proceeding
• concluding that “the State’s interests in rehabilitating sexually violent predators and protecting the public” outweighed the predator’s liberty interest to bail in a civil commitment proceedings
• concluding that “the State’s interests in rehabilitating sexually violent predators and protecting the public” outweighed the predator’s liberty interest to bail in a civil commitment proceedings
• noting that the inalienable rights clause secure Iowa common law rights that pre-existed Iowa’s Constitution.
• rejecting a challenge to pretrial detention under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVP
• involving claims by “pretrial detainees held by the Iowa Department of Corrections, awaiting hearing on their Iowa Code [c]hapter 229A, or who were committed pursuant to Iowa Code [c]hapter 229A” (alterations in original) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).