Skip to main content

State v. Oliveira

Citations

  • 730 A.2d 20
  • 1999 R.I. LEXIS 115
  • 1999 WL 353007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining 4 Unlike false pretenses, however, forgery is committed even if the forged document is not successfully passed. SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW § 19.7(j)(5
  • a trial justice’s decision limiting cross-examination will be overruled “only if such abuse constitutes prejudicial error”
  • trial justice erred when he granted the state's motion in limine to preclude the defendant from questioning the complaining witness during cross-examination about an ongoing investigation by state and federal tax authorities in regard to the witness's tax liabilities
  • paying cash done under table to avoid taxes
  • paying cash done under table to avoid taxes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger, Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.