State v. Yara Chum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant is “not entitled to have his version of events introduced through testimony of other witnesses”
• holding that “the trial justice properly precluded the defendant from eliciting his statement to police during the cross-examination” of two witnesses in a case where the defendant did not testify
• noting - 13 - that deference is given to a trial justice’s factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).