Skip to main content
· 7/8/1994

State v. Doctor

Citations

  • 644 A.2d 1287
  • 1994 WL 327653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying harmless-error analysis in case alleging violations of article 1, section 10 of the Rhode Island Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
  • discussing the right to cross-examine as well as the case of Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 (1986), and then concluding that “[i]n the present case we cannot find that this error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.