State v. Pollock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “offer- ing to sell a controlled substance constitutes a substantial step toward a completed transfer of that substance,” because “defendant’s intent is explicit”
• “We conclude that offering to sell a controlled substance constitutes a substantial step toward a completed transfer of that substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sandoval v. Sessions
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-01-27· cited 22×
• State v. Pollock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 18×
• United States v. Marcus Crum
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-08-16· cited 16×
• State v. Lawrence
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-23· cited 10×
• Leonel Sandoval v. Sally Yates
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-01-27· cited 10×
• State v. O'Hare
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-18· cited 6×
• State v. Sinkey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-29· cited 5×
• Werth v. Employment Dept.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29· cited 2×
• Werth v. Employment Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29· cited 1×
• Ernst v. United States
  D. Oregon· 2017-11-13· cited 1×
• State v. Scofield
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-26· cited 1×
• Leonel Sandoval v. Jefferson B. Sessions
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-08-08
• State v. Suing
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-24