United States v. Thongsangoune Sayakhom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s statements were not admissible because they were statements of belief to prove the fact believed, which are inadmissible under the terms of Rule 803(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).