Skip to main content
· 2/1/2017

Garner v. Premo

Citations

  • 283 Or. App. 494
  • 389 P.3d 1143
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because Court “was not in ‘actual receipt’ ”, NOA was not timely where received 139 days after mailing of BVA decision even though envelope with improper Court address bore timely postmark and even though appellant relied upon information provided by county veterans’ affairs office in mailing NOA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.