Montana Supreme Court· 11/3/1982
State v. Norgaard
Citations
- 653 P.2d 483
- 201 Mont. 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a district court’s conclusion that the excited utterance rule should not apply to a statement made one hour after a verbal argument
- trial judge has substantial discretion to exercise in determining whether an assertion against interest qualifies for exception to the hearsay rule, and only manifest abuse of that discretion will warrant reversal on appeal
- trial judge has substantial discretion to exercise in determining whether an assertion against interest qualifies for exception to the hearsay rule, and only manifest abuse of that discretion will warrant reversal on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morrison, Shea, Sheehy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re the Estate of HarmonMontana Supreme Court· 2011-05-25· cited 29×
- State v. WyerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-07-09· cited 25×
- State v. DeckerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-04-21· cited 21×
- State v. MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-12-31· cited 14×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-04-11· cited 14×
- Adams v. FranklinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-10· cited 11×
- Heddings v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-08-02· cited 7×
- State v. HambyMontana Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 4×
- Matter of TCMontana Supreme Court· 1989-12-20
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-05-04· cited 737×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
- Broncucia v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 188×
- United States v. Billy Gene ThomasTenth Circuit· 1973-06-04· cited 114×
- State v. ClawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-09-23· cited 94×
- People v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court· 1979-01-26· cited 72×
- Brooks v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 71×
- Jacques v. Montana National GuardMontana Supreme Court· 1982-08-23· cited 65×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-09-23· cited 64×
- State v. CostaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-07-18· cited 51×
- State v. CarylMontana Supreme Court· 1975-12-12· cited 40×
- State v. NicholsonWashington Supreme Court· 1969-12-24· cited 39×
- Lamb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1976-09-02· cited 39×
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-02-10· cited 39×
- State v. McLucasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-03-15· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.