Skip to main content

State v. Nichols

Citations

  • 819 P.2d 995
  • 169 Ariz. 409
  • 86 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 67
  • 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he fact that a statute designed primarily to serve remedial purposes incidentally serves the purposes of punishment as well does not mean that the statute results in punishment for double jeopardy purposes.”
  • post-Halper decision upholding proceeding similar to that challenged here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James C. Carruth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.