State v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that refusal to take breath test is not testimonial and is therefore admissible without violating Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
• stating that court-made procedural rules “may not diminish or augment substantive rights” (quoting Birmingham, 95 Ariz. at 316)
• “[R]ules of evidence are procedural in nature.”
• “[R]ules of evidence are procedural in nature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).