Skip to main content

State v. Munoz

Citations

  • 774 A.2d 515
  • 340 N.J. Super. 204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding \the State's invited response\ did not unfairly prejudice the defendant when it \did no more than balance the scales\
  • prosecutor's comment about marks on A-2252-20 45 defendant's face deemed permissible response to defense counsel's statement calling officer's testimony about those marks into question
  • \A prosecutor is permitted to respond to an argument raised by the defense so long as it does not constitute a foray beyond the evidence adduced at trial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Baime, Carchman and Lintner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.