New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 10/24/1988

State v. Flores

Citations

550 A.2d 752
228 N.J. Super. 586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding claims for excessive sentences, based on the imposition of consecutive sentences, \[do] not relate to the legality of the sentence imposed\
\perceiv[ing] no need to make [PCR] an open sesame for the wholesale review of sentences\
finding the court's alleged improper consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors and consecutive sentencing guidelines did not result in illegal sentence
\[Q]uestions concerning the adequacy of the sentencing court's A-4529-19 7 findings and the sufficiency of the trial court's weighing of the aggravating and mitigating factors should be addressed only by way of direct appeal.\
claim of excessive sentencing not cognizable in PCR proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Baime and D'annunzio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.