Supreme Court of New Jersey· 4/12/1965
State v. King
Citations
- 209 A.2d 110
- 44 N.J. 346
- 9 A.L.R. 3d 847
- 1965 N.J. LEXIS 236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \drunkometer\ tests and blood tests, among other types of examinations, are non-testimonial and not covered by Fifth Amendment protections
- stating that “drunkometer” tests and blood tests, among other types of examinations, are non-testimonial and not covered by Fifth Amendment protections
- setting forth various non-exhaustive factors supporting either voluntary or coerced nature of consent
- setting forth various non-exhaustive factors supporting either voluntary or coerced nature of consent
- listing factors to consider in determining whether consent to search was coerced
- breathalyzer test is nontestimonial and does not involve constitutional prohibition against compelled testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Proctor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-08-03· cited 379×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-10-08· cited 338×
- People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-12-23· cited 153×
- State v. DomiczSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-09-20· cited 104×
- State v. HagansSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-04-23· cited 76×
- State v. MaristanySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-27· cited 70×
- State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-07-28· cited 65×
- State v. DouglasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-09-13· cited 58×
- State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-03-31· cited 54×
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-11-26· cited 49×
- State v. MunozNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-04-26· cited 46×
- State v. BontempoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-07-20· cited 45×
- State v. Nathan Shaw State v. Keon L. Bolden (078247) (Monmouth County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2019-05-13· cited 41×
- State v. SteverSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-06-30· cited 38×
- State v. FarinichNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-03-31· cited 36×
- Rawlings v. Police Dept. of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-13· cited 35×
- Padgett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1969-02-11· cited 34×
- State v. ChapmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-06-30· cited 29×
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-01-19· cited 29×
- State v. GinardiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-08-07· cited 28×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1944-05-29· cited 459×
- Judd v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1951-05-19· cited 299×
- United States v. Ernest T. PageNinth Circuit· 1962-04-18· cited 186×
- Higgins v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-01-28· cited 114×
- United States v. Ruth SmithSecond Circuit· 1962-09-18· cited 114×
- Robert Edgar Channel v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1960-12-07· cited 106×
- Hightower v. BibbSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 91×
- United States v. George Ludwig DornblutSecond Circuit· 1958-12-29· cited 61×
- Riedel v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1960-04-04· cited 60×
- United States v. Petronio BurgosSecond Circuit· 1959-08-27· cited 31×
- United States v. Glen William ZiemerSeventh Circuit· 1961-06-13· cited 27×
- Shotkin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court· 1952-03-24· cited 24×
- United States v. MartinS.D. New York· 1959-08-13· cited 20×
- United States v. BusbyDistrict of Columbia· 1954-12-17· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.