Idaho Supreme Court· 6/11/2008
State v. Mubita
Citations
- 188 P.3d 867
- 145 Idaho 925
- 2008 Ida. LEXIS 113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring a defendant to bear the burden of proving an affirmative defense does not violate due process
- requiring a defendant to bear the burden of proving an affirmative defense does not violate due process
- “Unless the result is palpably absurd, this Court assumes the legislature meant what is clearly stated in the statute.”
- “Unless the result is palpably absurd, this Court assumes the legislature meant what is clearly stated in the statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-11-09· cited 251×
- State v. PurdumIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-04-20· cited 77×
- State v. BodenbachIdaho Supreme Court· 2019-09-03· cited 47×
- Miller v. IDAHO STATE PATROLIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-05-18· cited 37×
- State v. FelderIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-12-13· cited 25×
- State v. CottrellIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-02-08· cited 22×
- State v. PinaIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 18×
- State v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-30· cited 18×
- State v. EricksonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-03-01· cited 16×
- Hurtado v. LAND O'LAKES, INC.Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 8×
- State v. PeregrinaIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-09-07· cited 8×
- Steven Leslie Williams v. Dept of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-07-30· cited 7×
- State v. LEGRANDConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-07· cited 5×
- State v. Juan Roberto JimenezIdaho Court of Appeals· 2015-10-02· cited 4×
- State of Florida v. StricklingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-13· cited 1×
- State of Idaho v. Juan Carlos Fuentes Pina - FirstIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-07-08
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,197×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 961×
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 816×
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-01-09· cited 797×
- Martin v. OhioSupreme Court· 1987-04-20· cited 540×
- Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 451×
- State v. BurnightIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-04-16· cited 291×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-18· cited 208×
- United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerNinth Circuit· 1986-01-21· cited 180×
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-15· cited 162×
- State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-07-20· cited 156×
- State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 152×
- State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-09-28· cited 137×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.