Skip to main content

State v. Felder

Citations

  • 245 P.3d 1021
  • 150 Idaho 269
  • 2010 Ida. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting elevation of societal protection over mitigating 12 factors not an abuse of discretion
  • noting elevation of societal protection over mitigating factors not an abuse of discretion
  • noting elevation of societal protection over mitigating factors not an abuse of discretion
  • noting elevation of societal protection over mitigating factors not an abuse of discretion
  • “[W]hile the mitigating factors identified by [the defendant] may have some relevancy to sentencing, a court is not required to assess or balance all of the sentencing goals in an equal manner.”
  • “[W]hile the mitigating factors identified by [the defendant] may have some relevancy to sentencing, a court is not required to assess or balance all of the sentencing goals in an equal manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gutierrez, Lansing, Gratton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.