Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/10/1997

State v. Mott

Citations

692 A.2d 360
166 Vt. 188
1997 Vt. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to address civil claim regarding propriety of issuance of expired order because resolution in defendant’s favor would have no bearing on related criminal case
due process claims are resolved on facts before the Court and individual asserting denial of due process must show prejudice from asserted denial
“Defendant has no First Amendment right to inflict unwanted and harassing contact on another person.”
defendant charged with sending letter in violation of abuse prevention order need possess only intent to send letter, not intent to violate order
\[T]he validity of the order is a legal issue for resolution by the trial court and not by the jury.\
\We do not generally allow a person who is under a court order to challenge it by violating it.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.