· 9/19/2001
State v. Grindling
Citations
- 31 P.3d 915
- 96 Haw. 402
- 2001 Haw. LEXIS 354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was impermissible for defendant to attack collaterally underlying basis of protective order
- stating that a domestic restraining order is not subject to collateral attack in the criminal proceeding for its violation and collecting cases stating the same
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Acoba, Levinson, Moon, Nakayama, Ramil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.