Skip to main content
· 9/19/2001

State v. Grindling

Citations

  • 31 P.3d 915
  • 96 Haw. 402
  • 2001 Haw. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was impermissible for defendant to attack collaterally underlying basis of protective order
  • stating that a domestic restraining order is not subject to collateral attack in the criminal proceeding for its violation and collecting cases stating the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acoba, Levinson, Moon, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.