Skip to main content

State v. Hauge

Citations

  • 1996 SD 48
  • 547 N.W.2d 173
  • 1996 S.D. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that defendant's conduct of violating a protection order by sending a letter does not fall within the \ambit of the rights of free speech protected by the First Amendment\
  • stating that defendant’s conduct of violating a protection order by sending a letter does not fall within the “ambit of the rights - of free speech protected by the First Amendment”
  • one purpose of restraint on abuser’s conduct is to preserve “the mental and emotional health of the vulnerable,” which prevails over “other less compelling interests”
  • “Judges must exercise broad authority to fashion necessary safeguards for the unpredictable insecurities victims of domestic abuse often face.”
  • \Judges must exercise broad authority to fashion necessary safeguards for the unpredictable insecurities victims of domestic abuse often face.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Konenkamp, Miller, Sabers, Amundson, Gilbertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.