Skip to main content

State v. Keeton

Citations

  • 710 N.W.2d 531
  • 2006 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 30
  • 2006 WL 508369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding multiple actions and inferences supported finding of intent element of assault
  • accepting description of assault as “a direct, ineffectual act toward the commission of a battery”
  • walking toward clerk with outstretched hand, but pulling hand back to chest before making contact
  • upholding robbery conviction where defendant was trying to leave the store and clerk struggled to wrest the cash from his grip
  • deemphasizing the “label attached to the offense” if the State can prove “the mens rea required by the statute”
  • acknowledging regardless of the specific label attached—specific intent or general intent—the State must prove the elements of the crime and their accompanying mens rea beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.