Thorson v. Bend Mem'l Clinic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] self- represented party may not rely on an ORCP 47 E affidavit to defeat a motion for summary judgment.”
• “It is well established under Oregon law that, ‘[i]n most medical malpractice cases, expert testimony is required to establish the standard of care.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McKnight
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-08· cited 17×
• Morris v. Dental Care Today, P. C.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-26· cited 8×
• State v. Pryor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-19· cited 4×
• Sternberg v. Lechman-Su
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-09-18· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Civil
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-11· cited 127×
• Getchell v. Mansfield
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-10-20· cited 87×
• Chapman v. Mayfield
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-11-13· cited 67×
• Trees v. Ordonez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-10-03· cited 32×
• West v. Allied Signal, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-15· cited 20×
• Fieux v. Cardiovascular & Thoracic Clinic, P.C.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-14· cited 17×
• Baughman v. Pina
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-01· cited 16×
• State v. Morrow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-03-10· cited 16×
• Due-Donohue v. Beal
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-26· cited 5×
• State v. Silver
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 3×

Other cases named Thorson v. Bend Mem'l Clinic

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Thorson v. Bend Mem'l Clinic
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-08-10· cited 1×