Skip to main content

State v. Haines

Citations

  • 283 Or. App. 444
  • 388 P.3d 365
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant did not understand the benefits of having counsel at sentencing following a bench trial when his previous experience with an attorney was at sentencing following a plea deal with the state
  • explaining that a prima facie error exists when the trial court did not mention the risks of self-representation or put any facts on the record indicating the defen- dant understood the risks
  • not obtaining a valid waiver from a defendant who proceeds without counsel “is not harmless if, on review, we are unable to determine what the outcome would have been if the defendant had been represented by counsel” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, Garrett, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.