Skip to main content

State v. Morgan

Citations

  • 541 S.W.2d 385
  • 1976 Tenn. LEXIS 544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “where a witness is sought to be cross-examined as to specific instances of conduct as contemplated by Rule 608(b), the Court shall conduct a jury-out hearing for the purpose of determining that the probative value of such evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect”
  • reasoning that judges faced great “difficulty” in “applying a test that is vague and cannot be explicitly defined,” that the dictionary definition of “moral turpitude” had provided no guidance, and that the standard had produced inconsistent rulings
  • adopting Fed. R. Evid. 608(b) and 609(b)
  • adopting Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b)
  • adopting Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fones, Henry, Brock, Harbison, Hyder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.