State v. Philpott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[d]efendant’s equal-protection argument must fail because she has identified no similar class of persons that is treated more favorably under the act than she was”
• stating “[d]efendant’s equal-protection argument must fail because she has identified no similar class of persons that is treated more favorably under the act than she was”
• rejecting claim that instruction “invites the jury to make decisions based on speculation”
• “We will decline to consider arguments that do not pinpoint specific questions and objections the overruling of which is alleged to be error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).