Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 10/21/2004

State v. Moran

Citations

  • 151 N.H. 450
  • 861 A.2d 763
  • 2004 N.H. LEXIS 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that courts should consider whether defendant's conduct caused \substantial injury to consumers\ in determining whether such conduct constitutes a violation of the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act
  • explaining that courts should consider whether defendant’s conduct caused “substantial injury to consumers” in determining whether such conduct constitutes a violation of the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act
  • noting that the defendant “did not fail simply to perform his duties under the contract” for installation of siding, but induced a customer to pay him for materials “at a time when he clearly did not intend to perform the work”
  • noting CPA defendant did more than simply fail to perform under contract
  • defendant violated CPA by inducing homeowners to enter into contract with him to install siding when he did not intend to perform work, and he made misrepresentations to homeowners in effort to avoid performing work or refunding deposit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick, Dalianis, Duggan, Galway, Nadeau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.