Skip to main content

Axenics, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.

Citations

  • 164 N.H. 659
  • 62 A.3d 754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the spirit of Rule 408 supported the exclusion of internal memoranda concerning settlement contributions
  • opining that a “court cannot allow recovery under a theory of unjust enrichment when there is a valid, express contract covering the subject matter at hand”
  • stating that parties’ actions may constitute abandonment of a contract only if their actions are “positive, unequivocal and inconsistent with an intent to be further bound by the contract”
  • stating that parties’ actions may constitute abandonment of a contract only if their actions are “positive, unequivocal and inconsistent with an intent to be further bound by the contract”
  • noting that our Rule 408 is similar to the federal rule
  • “Assuming, without deciding, that unfair litigation tactics fall within the scope of the CPA . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bassett, Conboy, Dalianis, Hicks, Lynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.