Kelton v. Hollis Ranch, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he plain language of” New Hampshire’s consumer- protection statute “indicates that some element of knowledge on the part of the defendant is required”
• explaining that the CPA requires “a degree of knowledge or intent,” and that defendants are not liable for a “good faith mistake”
• “The trial court properly construed the legislature’s use of the words ‘deceptive’ and ‘unfair’ as requiring a degree of knowledge or intent.”
• “[I]t is not a CPA violation to sell bad goods or services; the CPA is implicated only when a seller induces the purchase of such goods through the use of deception.”
• “[I]t is not a CPA violation to sell bad goods or services; the CPA is implicated only when a seller induces the purchase of such goods through the use of deception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).