District of Columbia· 9/11/2018
Breiding v. Eversource Energy
Citations
- 344 F. Supp. 3d 433
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the improper motive factor was insufficient to overcome the other Associated General factors
- dismissing antirust and consumer protection claims against Avangrid and Eversource where the “requested relief would require the Court to determine the reasonableness of [wholesale electricity] rates and tariffs approved by FERC”
- \[T]he Court holds that the doctrine bars the federal and state law claims in the amended complaint.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 2,474×
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,155×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 2,097×
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 1,304×
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-30· cited 1,241×
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 680×
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 668×
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-03-26· cited 579×
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 508×
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 492×
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 482×
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLPSupreme Court· 2004-01-13· cited 412×
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-06· cited 379×
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-02-25· cited 340×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.