State v. Collins
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3011
Syllabus
Maximum Sentence Felony Sentencing Consecutive Sentencing R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Defendant-appellant's prison sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. Because the trial court made the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences and those findings are supported by the record, defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-15· cited 137×
- Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1969-12-17· cited 134×
- State v. HitesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-30· cited 116×
- State v. BrimacombeOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 96×
- State v. MaggetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-29· cited 90×
- State v. NobleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 88×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 80×
- State v. BollarOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-09· cited 57×
- State v. SlifeOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-08· cited 18×
- State v. WattsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-07· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.