Washington Supreme Court· 3/14/1968
State v. Montague
Citations
- 438 P.2d 571
- 73 Wash. 2d 381
- 1968 Wash. LEXIS 644
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the use of impoundment “as a device and pretext for making a general exploratory search of the car without a search warrant”
- rejecting the use of impoundment “as a device and pretext for making a general exploratory search of the car without a search warrant”
- “this court” would not “have any hesitancy in suppressing evidence of crime found during the taking of the inventory, if we found that . . . impoundment of the vehicle was resorted to as a device and pretext for making a general exploratory search of the car without a search warrant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 415×
- State v. HouserWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 235×
- State v. GluckWashington Supreme Court· 1974-02-07· cited 151×
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-06-28· cited 135×
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court· 1973-06-01· cited 108×
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-16· cited 93×
- United States v. Sam Meredith LawsonEighth Circuit· 1973-11-14· cited 92×
- People v. SullivanNew York Court of Appeals· 1971-07-07· cited 92×
- State v. BresolinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-05· cited 84×
- State v. JewellSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-10-19· cited 77×
- State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-07-16· cited 70×
- State v. BosterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-07-17· cited 69×
- State v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1969-12-30· cited 58×
- State v. HyghUtah Supreme Court· 1985-08-16· cited 58×
- State of Washington v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-01· cited 46×
- Godbee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-06-25· cited 46×
- State v. TylerWashington Supreme Court· 2013-05-30· cited 41×
- State v. GwinnSupreme Court of Delaware· 1973-01-30· cited 37×
- State v. WallenNebraska Supreme Court· 1970-01-06· cited 36×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 1,370×
- Gary Leland Cotton v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1967-01-23· cited 180×
- State v. MichaelsWashington Supreme Court· 1962-09-28· cited 138×
- Buford Linwood St. Clair v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-08-11· cited 55×
- People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-12-27· cited 49×
- Heffley v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1967-02-17· cited 39×
- People v. ProchnauCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-05-15· cited 39×
- State v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court· 1953-11-24· cited 34×
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-03-29· cited 31×
- People v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-05-20· cited 28×
- People v. OdegardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-05-09· cited 28×
- People v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-02-28· cited 22×
- Gerald Glen Boyden v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1966-07-20· cited 21×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-01-31· cited 20×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1961-04-28· cited 19×
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court· 1961-08-31· cited 17×
- People v. ManziNew York Supreme Court· 1963-02-11· cited 16×
- State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court· 1950-09-22· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.