Skip to main content

State v. Potts

Citations

  • 464 P.2d 742
  • 1 Wash. App. 614
  • 1969 Wash. App. LEXIS 380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an individual’s sole occupancy of the vehicle and possession of the vehicle’s keys sufficiently 11 No. 50386-7-II supports a finding that the defendant had dominion and control over the vehicle’s contents
  • sole occupant and driver of a vehicle has dominion and control over it and its contents
  • reasonable to infer dominion and control where defendant had car keys and was driving
  • sole occupant and driver of a vehicle has dominion and control over it and its contents
  • an automobile may be considered a premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petrie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.