Skip to main content

State v. Montague

Citations

  • 756 P.2d 1083
  • 114 Idaho 319
  • 1988 Ida. App. LEXIS 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an officer may draw reasonable inferences from the facts in his or her possession and that those inferences may be drawn from the officer’s experience and law enforcement training
  • holding the standard for reviewing trial court’s decision to reconsider is whether there has been an abuse of discretion
  • observing that “an officer may draw reasonable inferences from the facts in his possession, and those inferences may be informed by the officer’s experience and law enforcement training”
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in entertaining State’s request for reconsideration of suppression ruling
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in entertaining State's request for reconsideration of suppression ruling
  • this Court has held that a motion to reconsider, if not prohibited by an applicable rule, grants the trial court the “discretion to reexamine his prior ruling and to consider all information pertinent to the subject”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Court'S, Walters, Swanstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Montague

19 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.